chad: is failed state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is failed state 1.00
is failed 0.97
has state state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(delaware, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(central african republic, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is failed state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(delaware, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(delaware, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(central african republic, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(central african republic, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(chad, is failed state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(chad, is failed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(chad, is failed)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(chad, is failed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(chad, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(chad, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(chad, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(chad, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Salient(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chad, is failed state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(central african republic, is failed state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(delaware, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(central african republic, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(chad, is failed state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)