tennessee: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents school
Weight: 0.64
, florida
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, program
Weight: 0.59
, area
Weight: 0.59
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.36
, missouri
Weight: 0.36
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.36
, kentucky
Weight: 0.36
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be in state 0.96
was called state 0.85
was state in war 0.80
is dangerous state 0.79
be in state of emergency 0.76
is republican state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be in state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(missouri, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(missouri, be in state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(kentucky, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(kentucky, has state state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(tennessee, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be in state)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tennessee, be in state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(tennessee, be in state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be in state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, was called state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Plausible(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(missouri, be in state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(kentucky, has state state)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Typical(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)