california: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called state 0.89
is blue state 0.80
was chosen as state capital 0.76
become quickly state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mexico, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is blue state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is blue state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mexico, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(colorado, is blue state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is blue state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nevada, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(colorado, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(colorado, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(nevada, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(colorado, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(colorado, is blue state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(nevada, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nevada, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(california, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(california, is blue state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(california, be called state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(california, is blue state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(california, is blue state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(california, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nevada, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colorado, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nevada, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(colorado, is blue state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nevada, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Typical(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)