california: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents florida
Weight: 0.68
, new mexico
Weight: 0.67
, nation
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.63
, mexico
Weight: 0.62
Siblings los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, nevada
Weight: 0.37
, colorado
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
has state state 0.89
is blue state 0.79
was called golden state 0.78
be called golden state 0.77
become quickly state 0.77
was chosen as state capital 0.77
was becoming state issue 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mexico, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is blue state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is blue state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mexico, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(nevada, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(colorado, is blue state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(colorado, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(nevada, is blue state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(new mexico, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(colorado, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(colorado, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(nevada, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(nevada, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nevada, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(colorado, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(colorado, is blue state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(nevada, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(nevada, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(california, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(california, is blue state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(california, be called golden state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(california, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(california, be called golden state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(california, is blue state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(california, be called golden state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(california, is blue state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(california, be called golden state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(california, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Salient(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(colorado, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(nevada, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nevada, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(colorado, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(nevada, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Typical(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(new mexico, is blue state)