oklahoma: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called state 0.89
is red state 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(kansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kansas, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(kansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(oklahoma, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(oklahoma, be called state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(oklahoma, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)