kansas: is red state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.59
, missouri
Weight: 0.57
, town
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.56
Siblings oklahoma
Weight: 0.63
, nebraska
Weight: 0.35
, iowa
Weight: 0.34
, alabama
Weight: 0.34
, connecticut
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red state 1.00
has color red 0.87
has state state 0.81
was called state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(missouri, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has color red)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(state, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(state, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(missouri, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(kansas, is red state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kansas, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(kansas, has color red)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(kansas, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(kansas, was called state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(kansas, has color red)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(kansas, was called state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(kansas, was called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(kansas, was called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, has color red)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(state, has color red)