alabama: has color red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color red 1.00
has color white 0.93
is red state 0.87
have red dirt 0.77
be called crimson tide 0.76
be known as crimson tide 0.76
is crimson tide 0.76
called crimson tide 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, has color red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(texas, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has color white)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(texas, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has color red)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have red dirt)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, has color red)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(mississippi, has color red)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has color red)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(georgia, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(georgia, have red dirt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(alabama, has color red)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(alabama, has color white)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(alabama, is red state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color white)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(texas, has color red)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(georgia, have red dirt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(texas, has color red)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(alabama, has color red)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)