alabama: is red state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red state 1.00
has color red 0.87
be in state 0.82
has state state 0.81
be called state 0.78
have red dirt 0.77
be under state 0.76
be called crimson tide 0.76
has color white 0.76
be known as crimson tide 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new hampshire, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(texas, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(college, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has color white)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(texas, has color red)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has color red)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(georgia, have red dirt)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(texas, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(new hampshire, has color white) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(mississippi, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has color red)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(georgia, have red dirt) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(georgia, have red dirt)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(alabama, is red state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alabama, be under state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(alabama, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(alabama, be in state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(alabama, be under state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(alabama, be under state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(alabama, has color red)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alabama, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(alabama, have red dirt)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, have red dirt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(alabama, has color white)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(alabama, be known as crimson tide)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(alabama, be called crimson tide)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(alabama, have red dirt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(alabama, have red dirt)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(alabama, be known as crimson tide)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(alabama, be called crimson tide)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(alabama, be known as crimson tide)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called crimson tide)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(alabama, has color white)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(alabama, has color white)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called crimson tide)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be known as crimson tide)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be under state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(texas, has color red)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(georgia, have red dirt)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(texas, has color red)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)