alabama: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
be in state 0.90
has state state 0.89
be referred as state 0.85
was given state 0.82
be known as state 0.82
be under state 0.80
is red state 0.78
is best state 0.77
has state home 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(college, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be known as state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(arkansas, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be known as state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alabama, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be referred as state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(alabama, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(alabama, be in state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alabama, be under state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(alabama, was given state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state home)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(alabama, be under state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was given state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be under state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(alabama, be under state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be known as state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(alabama, was given state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(alabama, be referred as state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(alabama, has state home)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(alabama, was given state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be known as state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(alabama, be referred as state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alabama, be known as state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state home)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(alabama, be known as state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(alabama, be referred as state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(alabama, is red state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(alabama, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(alabama, has state home)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(arkansas, be known as state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)