mississippi: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.62
, alabama
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
, river
Weight: 0.58
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.57
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north dakota
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called mongolia state 0.89
be called state 0.89
has state last 0.87
be considered state 0.84
is red state 0.81
is dangerous state 0.79
is poor state 0.79
be considered rural state 0.77
is most dangerous state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(alabama, is red state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mississippi, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mississippi, be called state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(mississippi, be considered state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(mississippi, has state last)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mississippi, is red state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state last)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state last)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state last)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is most dangerous state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(mississippi, is most dangerous state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is dangerous state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(mississippi, is poor state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is most dangerous state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(mississippi, is dangerous state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(mississippi, is most dangerous state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is dangerous state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mississippi, is dangerous state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(mississippi, has state state)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)