alabama: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
be in state 0.80
has state state 0.79
is best state 0.77
is worst state 0.77
be called state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(texas, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(texas, is worst state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(college, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(texas, is worst state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is worst state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is worst state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is worst state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(georgia, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(texas, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(georgia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(georgia, is poor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(new mexico, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is worst state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(mississippi, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is worst state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(arkansas, is worst state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is worst state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(alabama, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(alabama, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(alabama, be in state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alabama, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(alabama, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(texas, is worst state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(georgia, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new mexico, is worst state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mississippi, is worst state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(arkansas, is worst state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(texas, is worst state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)