new mexico: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents texas
Weight: 0.74
, mexico
Weight: 0.73
, north america
Weight: 0.69
, country
Weight: 0.65
Siblings nevada
Weight: 0.68
, los angeles
Weight: 0.68
, california
Weight: 0.67
, san diego
Weight: 0.67
, colorado
Weight: 0.65

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
has state state 0.79
is worst state 0.77
is dangerous state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mexico, is poor)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(texas, is worst state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(mexico, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(texas, is worst state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(mexico, is poor)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(mexico, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(texas, is worst state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(mexico, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(nevada, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(mexico, is poor)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(texas, is worst state)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(mexico, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(nevada, has state state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(nevada, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(new mexico, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is worst state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is worst state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(new mexico, is worst state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(new mexico, is worst state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(new mexico, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(new mexico, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(new mexico, is dangerous state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is dangerous state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is dangerous state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(new mexico, is dangerous state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mexico, is poor)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(texas, is worst state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(nevada, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(mexico, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(mexico, is poor)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(new mexico, is poor state)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(texas, is worst state)