texas: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be state in 0.96
be called longstar state 0.89
be called lonestar state 0.89
be called state 0.89
be good state for education 0.80
is best state 0.80
is second state 0.80
was last state free 0.79
is one party state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(arizona, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nebraska, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(arizona, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(arizona, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.18
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(arizona, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nebraska, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(texas, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(texas, be called longstar state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(texas, be called longstar state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(texas, be called longstar state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(texas, is best state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(texas, be good state for education)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(texas, be called longstar state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, be good state for education)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(arizona, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(arizona, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.09
Typical(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)