texas: be good state for education

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents arizona
Weight: 0.67
, nebraska
Weight: 0.64
, school
Weight: 0.60
, university
Weight: 0.58
, program
Weight: 0.57
Siblings tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35
, california
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good state for education 1.00
be state in 0.82
has state state 0.80
be bad state live in 0.80
be bad state live 0.80
is best state 0.79
be called longstar state 0.78
be called lonestar state 0.78
be called state 0.78
be best state live in 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(arizona, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nebraska, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(arizona, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(arizona, has state state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(california, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(california, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, be good state for education)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(arizona, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, be good state for education)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(nebraska, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, be good state for education)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(texas, be good state for education)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(california, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(california, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(california, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(california, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(texas, be good state for education)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(texas, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(texas, be called longstar state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(texas, be called longstar state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(texas, be called longstar state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(texas, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(texas, be called lonestar state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(texas, be called longstar state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Salient(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(texas, be good state for education)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(arizona, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(california, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(california, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(arizona, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(texas, be good state for education) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)