nebraska: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, program
Weight: 0.58
, area
Weight: 0.57
, place
Weight: 0.55
, team
Weight: 0.55
Siblings texas
Weight: 0.64
, kansas
Weight: 0.35
, wisconsin
Weight: 0.35
, wyoming
Weight: 0.35
, arkansas
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called cornhuskers state 0.89
be called state 0.89
is cornhusker state 0.84
be called cornhusker state 0.82
be agriculture state 0.78
have legislature 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(kansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kansas, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(nebraska, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(nebraska, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be agriculture state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(nebraska, have legislature)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, have legislature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(nebraska, have legislature)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(nebraska, be agriculture state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be agriculture state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(nebraska, be agriculture state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(nebraska, have legislature)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)