wyoming: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.62
, state
Weight: 0.59
, school
Weight: 0.57
, country
Weight: 0.52
Siblings idaho
Weight: 0.35
, springfield
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, nebraska
Weight: 0.35
, mexico city
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
is even state 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(idaho, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(wyoming, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, is even state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(wyoming, is even state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(wyoming, is even state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, is even state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Plausible(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)