nebraska: is cornhusker state

Related concepts

Parents	state Weight: 0.60 , program Weight: 0.58 , area Weight: 0.57 , place Weight: 0.55 , team Weight: 0.55
Siblings	texas Weight: 0.64 , kansas Weight: 0.35 , wisconsin Weight: 0.35 , wyoming Weight: 0.35 , arkansas Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
is cornhusker state	1.00
be called cornhusker state	0.97
has state state	0.84
be called cornhuskers state	0.81
be called state	0.81
be agriculture state	0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(wyoming, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(kansas, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(kansas, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.20

¬ Plausible(kansas, has state state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

Remarkable(texas, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.91

Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

Remarkable(wyoming, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Plausible(wyoming, has state state)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

Remarkable(wisconsin, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state)

Similarity expansion

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Salient(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.25

¬ Typical(nebraska, be called cornhusker state)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Salient(nebraska, has state state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Salient(nebraska, be called state)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called state)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Salient(nebraska, be agriculture state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be agriculture state)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Plausible(nebraska, be agriculture state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called state)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Typical(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75

Evidence: 0.14

Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Typical(nebraska, be agriculture state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.49

¬ Salient(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called cornhuskers state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.09

Salient(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.05

Plausible(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Typical(nebraska, is cornhusker state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Typical(texas, has state state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Typical(wyoming, has state state)

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(nebraska, is cornhusker state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(wisconsin, has state state)