arkansas: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents state
Weight: 0.60
, place
Weight: 0.57
, school
Weight: 0.55
, alabama
Weight: 0.55
Siblings idaho
Weight: 0.35
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, oregon
Weight: 0.34
, nebraska
Weight: 0.34
, georgia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
has state state 0.79
is worst state 0.77
be called state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(idaho, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(georgia, is poor)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(oregon, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(nebraska, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(idaho, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(idaho, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(georgia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(georgia, is poor)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(idaho, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(idaho, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(oregon, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(oregon, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(nebraska, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(nebraska, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
Remarkable(idaho, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(idaho, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(idaho, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(idaho, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(nebraska, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(nebraska, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(arkansas, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is worst state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(arkansas, is worst state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is worst state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(arkansas, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(arkansas, is worst state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(arkansas, be called state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(arkansas, is poor)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(georgia, is poor)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(oregon, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(nebraska, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(idaho, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(nebraska, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(idaho, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.46
Typical(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)