alabama: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be in state 0.96
be called state 0.89
has state home 0.85
be under state 0.84
was given state 0.82
is red state 0.81
is best state 0.80
is poor state 0.79
be known as state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(college, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(texas, has state state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, be known as state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(arkansas, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be known as state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(new mexico, is poor state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(alabama, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alabama, be under state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state home)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(alabama, be in state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(alabama, be under state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(alabama, was given state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(alabama, be under state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(alabama, has state home)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is best state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be under state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(alabama, was given state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state home)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(alabama, was given state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be known as state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(alabama, was given state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be known as state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(alabama, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(alabama, is poor state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(alabama, be known as state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(alabama, has state home)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(alabama, be known as state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(alabama, is red state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(alabama, is best state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(alabama, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(alabama, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(arkansas, be known as state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(new mexico, is poor state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(college, be called state)