mississippi: is poor state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.62
, alabama
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
, river
Weight: 0.58
, new hampshire
Weight: 0.57
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north carolina
Weight: 0.35
, north dakota
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor state 1.00
is poor 0.95
is poorest state 0.84
has state state 0.79
be worst state live in 0.77
be worst state live 0.77
be considered rural state 0.77
is worst state 0.77
be called mongolia state 0.76
be called state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(louisiana, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(louisiana, be worst state live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be worst state live in)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be worst state live in)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(south carolina, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(georgia, is poor)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(louisiana, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(louisiana, be worst state live in) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(georgia, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(georgia, is poor)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(south carolina, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(south carolina, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(mississippi, is poor state)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(mississippi, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poorest state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is worst state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Salient(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is worst state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(mississippi, is worst state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be worst state live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(mississippi, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(mississippi, is poorest state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be worst state live in)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(mississippi, be worst state live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(mississippi, be worst state live in)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poorest state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called mongolia state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be worst state live in)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be worst state live)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(mississippi, is worst state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poorest state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(mississippi, be worst state live in)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(mississippi, be worst state live)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(mississippi, is poor)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(louisiana, be worst state live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(georgia, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(south carolina, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(louisiana, be worst state live in)