mississippi: be considered rural state

Related concepts

Parents	area Weight: 0.62 , alabama Weight: 0.60 , louisiana Weight: 0.58 , river Weight: 0.58 , new hampshire Weight: 0.57
Siblings	georgia Weight: 0.35 , south carolina Weight: 0.35 , north carolina Weight: 0.35 , north dakota Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered rural state	1.00
be considered state	0.84
be called mongolia state	0.78
be called state	0.78
has state state	0.77
is poor state	0.77
is poorest state	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(louisiana, is poor state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.33

¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.47

¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.50

Plausible(alabama, is poor state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.40

Plausible(alabama, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.33

Plausible(louisiana, is poor state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.26

Plausible(alabama, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.22

Plausible(louisiana, has state state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state)

Similarity expansion

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be considered state)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(mississippi, be considered state)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered state)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.13

¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called mongolia state)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.14

¬ Salient(mississippi, has state state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.16

¬ Salient(mississippi, be called mongolia state)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called mongolia state)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.18

¬ Salient(mississippi, be called state)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(mississippi, be called mongolia state)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.30

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poorest state)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(mississippi, is poorest state)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.55

¬ Typical(mississippi, is poorest state)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Salient(mississippi, is poor state)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poorest state)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.45

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.15

Salient(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.16

Plausible(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.15

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.32

¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.41

Typical(mississippi, be considered rural state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)