louisiana: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.58
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.58
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
has state state 0.89
be state has 0.86
is red state 0.78
be called sugar state 0.78
is poor state 0.76
was last state adopt 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(louisiana, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called sugar state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(louisiana, be called sugar state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(louisiana, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(louisiana, is poor state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called sugar state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state has)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(louisiana, is red state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be state has)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(louisiana, be state has)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called sugar state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.11
Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(louisiana, was last state adopt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Salient(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)