louisiana: be state has

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.61
, location
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.59
, country
Weight: 0.58
Siblings louis armstrong
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.58
, oklahoma
Weight: 0.58
, alabama
Weight: 0.35
, south carolina
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be state has 1.00
has state state 0.97
be called state 0.86
is red state 0.79
was last state adopt 0.77
is poor state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(oklahoma, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(alabama, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(alabama, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(oklahoma, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(alabama, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(alabama, be called state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
Remarkable(mississippi, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(mississippi, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(alabama, is poor state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(alabama, is poor state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(alabama, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(louisiana, be state has)

Similarity expansion

0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(louisiana, has state state)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has state state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has state state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(louisiana, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(louisiana, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(louisiana, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be called state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is poor state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(louisiana, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(louisiana, is red state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(louisiana, is poor state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is poor state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(louisiana, is poor state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(louisiana, was last state adopt)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(louisiana, was last state adopt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(louisiana, be state has)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(oklahoma, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(alabama, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(mississippi, is poor state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(alabama, is poor state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, be state has) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)