alabama: be in state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents new hampshire
Weight: 0.65
, country
Weight: 0.64
, texas
Weight: 0.63
, college
Weight: 0.61
Siblings georgia
Weight: 0.64
, mississippi
Weight: 0.60
, atlanta
Weight: 0.59
, arkansas
Weight: 0.55
, new mexico
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in state 1.00
has state state 0.96
be called state 0.90
be under state 0.85
has state home 0.84
was given state 0.83
is best state 0.82
is red state 0.82
is poor state 0.80
be known as state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)
...

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(texas, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(texas, is best state)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(college, be called state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has state state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(texas, is best state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is best state)
...

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(mississippi, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(new mexico, is poor state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor state)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(new hampshire, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(texas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(college, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(texas, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(new hampshire, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(alabama, be in state)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(arkansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(arkansas, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(new mexico, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(new mexico, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(mississippi, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(mississippi, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(arkansas, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(arkansas, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(mississippi, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(mississippi, be called state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(alabama, be in state)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(alabama, has state home)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be called state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(alabama, be under state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(alabama, has state state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(alabama, be in state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
...

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(arkansas, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(new mexico, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(mississippi, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(arkansas, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(mississippi, be called state)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(texas, has state state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(new hampshire, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is best state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(texas, is best state)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.08
Typical(alabama, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)
...