alabama: has color white

Related concepts

Parents	new hampshire Weight: 0.65 , country Weight: 0.64 , texas Weight: 0.63 , college Weight: 0.61
Siblings	georgia Weight: 0.64 , mississippi Weight: 0.60 , atlanta Weight: 0.59 , arkansas Weight: 0.55 , new mexico Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has color white	1.00
has color red	0.93
is red state	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.61

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(new hampshire, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(alabama, has color white)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(texas, has color red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(alabama, has color white)

0.30

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(alabama, has color white)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, has color white)

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(texas, has color red)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Plausible(new hampshire, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, is red state)

0.33

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Remarkable(new hampshire, has color white)

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(texas, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, has color red)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(mississippi, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.90

Plausible(new hampshire, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(alabama, has color white)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(texas, has color red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(alabama, has color white)

0.29

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.48

Plausible(new hampshire, is red state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Plausible(alabama, has color white)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.39

Remarkable(mississippi, has color red) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(mississippi, has color red)

0.43

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(mississippi, is red state) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Plausible(mississippi, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.88

¬ Salient(alabama, has color white)

Similarity expansion

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(alabama, has color red)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.72

¬ Typical(alabama, has color red)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Plausible(alabama, has color red)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color red)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Salient(alabama, is red state)

0.57

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(alabama, is red state)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Plausible(alabama, is red state)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Typical(alabama, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.88

Salient(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Plausible(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Typical(alabama, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(texas, has color red)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.51

¬ Typical(mississippi, has color red)

0.06

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

¬ Remarkable(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Typical(mississippi, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.96

¬ Typical(new hampshire, has color white)

0.37

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(texas, has color red)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.76

Typical(alabama, has color white) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(new hampshire, is red state)