iowa: has state state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state state 1.00
be called state 0.89
has state first 0.87
is important state 0.87
is first state 0.85
was called state 0.85
is political state 0.80
is best state 0.80
is blue state 0.80
is primary state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is blue state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennessee, was called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tennessee, was called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(connecticut, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is blue state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(michigan, is blue state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(michigan, is blue state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(iowa, has state state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is blue state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(iowa, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(iowa, has state first)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(iowa, is blue state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(iowa, is best state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(iowa, is blue state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(iowa, is blue state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, was called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(connecticut, is blue state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(michigan, is blue state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)