iowa: has state first

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has state first 1.00
is first state 0.97
has state state 0.87
be first state hold 0.86
is first primary state 0.85
was called state 0.81
is important state 0.80
is best state 0.79
be called state 0.78
is first primary 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, was called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(tennessee, was called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(tennessee, was called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(iowa, has state first)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(iowa, has state state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, is first primary state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(iowa, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is first primary state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, is first primary state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(iowa, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, is first primary state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(iowa, is first primary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, is first primary)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is first primary)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(iowa, is first primary)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, was called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(iowa, has state first) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)