ohio: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
is worst state ever 0.85
is bad state 0.83
be called state 0.77
be important as primary state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ohio, be called state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(ohio, be important as primary state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be important as primary state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(ohio, be important as primary state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ohio, be important as primary state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Typical(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)