illinois: is bad state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad state 1.00
has state state 0.85
is great state 0.82
be called state 0.82
be in bad shape 0.80
be worst state live in 0.79
be worst state live 0.79
be bad at football 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state)
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(illinois, is bad state)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(illinois, is great state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illinois, is great state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(illinois, be bad at football)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(illinois, be bad at football)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(illinois, be worst state live)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(illinois, is great state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(illinois, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(illinois, be worst state live in)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(illinois, is bad state)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)