indiana: is bad state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad state 1.00
has state state 0.85
is best state 0.83
be called state 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
is red state 0.78
is horrible 0.78
be bad at football 0.75
is hoosier state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(illinois, be bad at football)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(school, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(school, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(school, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(west virginia, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(west virginia, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(indiana, be bad at football)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is hoosier state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is horrible)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(indiana, is horrible)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(indiana, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is horrible)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(indiana, is horrible)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(indiana, is red state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(indiana, has quality bad)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(indiana, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(indiana, is best state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(west virginia, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(west virginia, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.36
Typical(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(school, has quality bad)