indiana: be bad at football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at football 1.00
be famous for basketball 0.81
is basketball state 0.80
be known for basketball 0.79
is bad state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(illinois, be bad at football)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(indiana, be bad at football)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(indiana, is basketball state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(indiana, is basketball state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is basketball state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(indiana, is basketball state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Salient(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(tennessee, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)