indiana: be famous for basketball

Related concepts

Parents	illinois Weight: 0.64 , pennsylvania Weight: 0.60 , school Weight: 0.59 , florida Weight: 0.58
Siblings	michigan Weight: 0.59 , ohio Weight: 0.36 , west virginia Weight: 0.36 , tennessee Weight: 0.35 , missouri Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be famous for basketball	1.00
be known for basketball	0.94
is basketball state	0.91
be bad at football	0.81
is famous	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(illinois, is famous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball)

0.20

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Plausible(illinois, be bad at football)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Plausible(illinois, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.46

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Remarkable(illinois, is famous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

¬ Remarkable(ohio, is famous)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is famous)

0.09

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Remarkable(michigan, is famous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.89

Plausible(illinois, is famous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball)

0.24

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.08

Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.43

¬ Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

Remarkable(tennessee, be bad at football) ⋁

Evidence: 0.05

¬ Plausible(tennessee, be bad at football)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(michigan, is famous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(michigan, is famous)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.63

Remarkable(ohio, is famous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(ohio, is famous)

0.38

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

Remarkable(west virginia, is famous) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Plausible(west virginia, is famous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.07

¬ Plausible(indiana, is basketball state)

0.74

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.08

¬ Salient(indiana, is basketball state)

0.73

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(indiana, is basketball state)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Typical(indiana, is basketball state)

0.68

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Salient(indiana, be bad at football)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known for basketball)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.57

¬ Typical(indiana, be known for basketball)

0.65

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Salient(indiana, be known for basketball)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)

0.64

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(indiana, be known for basketball)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(indiana, is famous)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Remarkable(indiana, is famous)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(indiana, is famous)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Salient(indiana, is famous)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.31

Salient(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.43

Plausible(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.67

¬ Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(illinois, is famous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.28

¬ Typical(tennessee, be bad at football)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(michigan, is famous)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(ohio, is famous)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.23

¬ Remarkable(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Typical(west virginia, is famous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)

0.26

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.67

Typical(indiana, be famous for basketball) ⋁

Evidence: 0.95

¬ Typical(illinois, is famous)