illinois: be bad at football

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad at football 1.00
is bad state 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(indiana, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(indiana, be bad at football)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(illinois, be bad at football)

Similarity expansion

0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(illinois, is bad state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
Plausible(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(illinois, be bad at football)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(indiana, be bad at football)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(illinois, be bad at football) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)