ohio: is bad state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is bad state 1.00
is best state 0.83
be called state 0.82
has quality bad 0.82
be good state for agriculture 0.79
is worst state ever 0.78
is red state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cleveland, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(iowa, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cleveland, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cleveland, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, is bad state)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(ohio, is worst state ever)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ohio, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ohio, is red state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(ohio, is best state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(cleveland, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.61
Typical(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad)