wisconsin: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
is bad state 0.83
has state state 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)
...

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has state state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.77
Plausible(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
...