ohio: is red state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red state 1.00
has color red 0.87
be called state 0.78
is bad state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.24
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(florida, has color red)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(iowa, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(ohio, is red state)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, has color red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, is bad state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(ohio, be called state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ohio, has color red)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(ohio, has color red)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has color red)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Salient(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)