florida: has color red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents north carolina
Weight: 0.71
, california
Weight: 0.70
, south carolina
Weight: 0.70
, ohio
Weight: 0.69
Siblings walt disney world
Weight: 0.62
, georgia
Weight: 0.62
, tennessee
Weight: 0.61
, indiana
Weight: 0.58
, spoonbill
Weight: 0.40

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color red 1.00
is red state 0.87
be called orange state 0.79
have red tide 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ohio, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ohio, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(ohio, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(ohio, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(florida, has color red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(florida, has color red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tennessee, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(indiana, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(indiana, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(florida, has color red)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(florida, is red state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(florida, be called orange state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(florida, be called orange state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(florida, be called orange state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(florida, be called orange state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(florida, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, has color red)
0.17
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color red)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(indiana, has color red)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, has color red)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(florida, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)