wisconsin: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents area
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.57
, university
Weight: 0.56
, republican
Weight: 0.56
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.66
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, minneapolis
Weight: 0.55
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.46
, michigan
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is bad state 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(wisconsin, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Salient(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(wisconsin, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)