ohio: be good state for agriculture

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents wisconsin
Weight: 0.66
, illinois
Weight: 0.64
, new york
Weight: 0.61
, free state
Weight: 0.60
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.69
, neil armstrong
Weight: 0.63
, cleveland
Weight: 0.62
, iowa
Weight: 0.62
, columbus
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good state for agriculture 1.00
is bad state 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(wisconsin, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Similarity expansion

0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(ohio, is bad state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
Plausible(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(wisconsin, is bad state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(ohio, be good state for agriculture) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)