iowa: is best state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best state 1.00
be best state live 0.92
be best state live in 0.92
is first state 0.82
is important state 0.82
has state state 0.80
has state first 0.79
is first primary state 0.77
be called state 0.77
be first state hold 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be called state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(connecticut, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(connecticut, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(connecticut, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(iowa, is best state)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(iowa, be best state live in)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(iowa, has state state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(iowa, be called state)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(iowa, has state first)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is first primary state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(iowa, is first primary state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state first)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state first)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(iowa, has state first)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(iowa, is first primary state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(iowa, is first primary state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Salient(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(connecticut, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(connecticut, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(iowa, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)