iowa: be best state live in

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents ohio
Weight: 0.62
, town
Weight: 0.61
, city
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.60
, missouri
Weight: 0.59
Siblings florida
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, michigan
Weight: 0.35
, connecticut
Weight: 0.35
, charleston
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be best state live in 1.00
be best state live 1.00
is best state 0.92
be good place live 0.87
is first state 0.77
be first state hold 0.77
is important state 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(missouri, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(missouri, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(ohio, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be good place live)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be good place live)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(ohio, is best state)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(ohio, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.63
Plausible(missouri, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.76
Remarkable(connecticut, is best state)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(connecticut, is best state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(charleston, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(charleston, be good place live)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(connecticut, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(connecticut, be good place live)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, be good place live)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be good place live)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(iowa, be best state live in)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(iowa, is best state)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(iowa, is best state)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(iowa, is best state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(iowa, be good place live)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(iowa, be good place live)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(iowa, be good place live)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(iowa, is best state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be good place live)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(iowa, be best state live in)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(missouri, be good place live)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(connecticut, is best state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(connecticut, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(charleston, be good place live)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(tennessee, be good place live)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(missouri, be good place live)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.93
Typical(iowa, be best state live in)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(ohio, be good place live)