indiana: be called state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called state 1.00
has state state 0.89
be called naptown 0.84
be called hoosier state 0.84
is bad state 0.82
be known as state 0.82
is red state 0.78
be called region 0.78
be known as hoosier state 0.78
is best state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(florida, is red state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(florida, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, is best state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(michigan, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is best state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(illinois, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(florida, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(pennsylvania, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(ohio, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(ohio, is best state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(ohio, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(ohio, is bad state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(michigan, is best state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(michigan, is best state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(west virginia, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(west virginia, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(ohio, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(ohio, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called hoosier state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called hoosier state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(indiana, be called hoosier state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(indiana, is bad state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called region)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(indiana, be called hoosier state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(indiana, be called region)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(indiana, be called region)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called region)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(indiana, be called naptown)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, be called naptown)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is best state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(indiana, be known as state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(indiana, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(indiana, is best state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(indiana, is best state)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(indiana, is best state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.33
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Salient(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(ohio, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(west virginia, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(michigan, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(ohio, is best state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(florida, is red state)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Typical(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, is best state)