indiana: be called naptown

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be called naptown 1.00
be called state 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, be called naptown)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(indiana, be called naptown)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.31
Salient(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(indiana, be called naptown)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.31
Typical(indiana, be called naptown)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)