indiana: be known as state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents illinois
Weight: 0.64
, pennsylvania
Weight: 0.60
, school
Weight: 0.59
, florida
Weight: 0.58
Siblings michigan
Weight: 0.59
, ohio
Weight: 0.36
, west virginia
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.35
, missouri
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be known as state 1.00
be known as hoosier state 0.89
be called state 0.82
has state state 0.78
be known for basketball 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(illinois, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.17
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(illinois, has state state)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.21
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(florida, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(west virginia, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(pennsylvania, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.31
Plausible(illinois, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.26
Plausible(pennsylvania, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(missouri, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
Remarkable(missouri, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(west virginia, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(west virginia, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
Remarkable(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(indiana, be known as state)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(indiana, be called state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Salient(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as hoosier state)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(indiana, has state state)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(indiana, be known for basketball)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(indiana, be known for basketball)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(indiana, be known as state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(west virginia, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(ohio, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, has state state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(pennsylvania, be called state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(indiana, be known as state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)