missouri: is red state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents iowa
Weight: 0.62
, school
Weight: 0.61
, program
Weight: 0.60
, area
Weight: 0.58
Siblings kansas
Weight: 0.57
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36
, georgia
Weight: 0.35
, kentucky
Weight: 0.35
, indiana
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is red state 1.00
is showme state 0.82
be in state 0.82
has state state 0.81
be called show-me state 0.78
be called state 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(iowa, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(iowa, has state state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(iowa, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.26
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(iowa, be called state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Remarkable(iowa, has state state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, be in state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(kentucky, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has state state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(iowa, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(iowa, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(missouri, is red state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(kentucky, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(kentucky, is red state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(indiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(indiana, is red state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(kansas, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(kansas, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(tennessee, be in state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(tennessee, be in state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(kentucky, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(kentucky, has state state)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(tennessee, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(kentucky, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(kentucky, be called state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(missouri, is red state)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(missouri, is showme state)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(missouri, is showme state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(missouri, be in state)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(missouri, be in state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(missouri, be in state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, is showme state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is showme state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(missouri, has state state)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Salient(missouri, has state state)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(missouri, be called state)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(missouri, be called state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be in state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(missouri, be called show-me state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(missouri, has state state)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(missouri, be called show-me state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(missouri, be called show-me state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(missouri, be called show-me state)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Salient(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(missouri, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(kansas, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(tennessee, be in state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(kentucky, has state state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(tennessee, has state state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(kentucky, be called state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(indiana, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(kentucky, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(iowa, has state state)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(missouri, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(iowa, be called state)