illinois: is great state

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents country
Weight: 0.62
, university
Weight: 0.59
, north carolina
Weight: 0.59
, michigan
Weight: 0.59
Siblings ohio
Weight: 0.64
, indiana
Weight: 0.64
, chicago
Weight: 0.63
, south carolina
Weight: 0.36
, florida
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is great state 1.00
is bad state 0.82
has state state 0.78
be called state 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(illinois, is great state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(illinois, is great state)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(michigan, has state state)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Remarkable(michigan, has state state)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(university, be called state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(indiana, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(ohio, is bad state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(indiana, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(ohio, be called state)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(indiana, has state state)
...

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(university, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illinois, is great state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(michigan, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(illinois, is great state)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(florida, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(florida, has state state)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(indiana, is bad state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(indiana, is bad state)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(indiana, has state state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(indiana, has state state)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(indiana, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(indiana, be called state)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(ohio, be called state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(ohio, be called state)
...

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(illinois, is great state)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(illinois, is bad state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is bad state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(illinois, is bad state)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(illinois, has state state)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(illinois, is bad state)
...

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Salient(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(illinois, is great state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(indiana, is bad state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(florida, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(indiana, has state state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(indiana, be called state)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Typical(ohio, is bad state)
...

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(michigan, has state state)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(illinois, is great state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(university, be called state)