oklahoma: has color red

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has color red 1.00
is red state 0.87
have red dirt 0.77
is dirt red 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(kansas, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(louisiana, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(kansas, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has color red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has color red)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(kansas, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(louisiana, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.56
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tennessee, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color red)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(oklahoma, has color red)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(oklahoma, is red state)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is dirt red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
Salient(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(louisiana, has color red)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color red)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(louisiana, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(oklahoma, has color red) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)