oklahoma: have red dirt

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents kansas
Weight: 0.63
, school
Weight: 0.60
, north america
Weight: 0.60
, louisiana
Weight: 0.58
Siblings south america
Weight: 0.37
, latin america
Weight: 0.36
, central america
Weight: 0.36
, tennessee
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have red dirt 1.00
is dirt red 0.99
is red state 0.77
has color red 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(kansas, has color red)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(louisiana, has color red)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(louisiana, has color red)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(kansas, has color red)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(kansas, is red state)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(kansas, is red state)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, is red state)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(louisiana, has color red)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(kansas, has color red)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(kansas, is red state)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(kansas, has color red)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Plausible(louisiana, has color red)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(louisiana, is red state)
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(tennessee, has color red)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(tennessee, has color red)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tennessee, is red state)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(tennessee, is red state)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(oklahoma, is dirt red)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(oklahoma, is red state)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(oklahoma, has color red)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, is red state)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, is red state)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(oklahoma, is red state)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(oklahoma, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, has color red)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(oklahoma, has color red)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.54
Plausible(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(louisiana, has color red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(tennessee, has color red)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Remarkable(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(tennessee, is red state)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(louisiana, is red state)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(louisiana, has color red)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(kansas, has color red)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(oklahoma, have red dirt)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(kansas, is red state)