:
from
Related concepts
Related properties
Priors about this statement
Cues
|
Evidence
|
Clauses
Plausibility inference from child typicality
0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, is poor)
Plausibility inheritance from parent to child
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)
Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)
Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is poor)
Remarkability from parent implausibility
Remarkability from sibling implausibility
Salient implies Plausible
0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, is poor)
Similarity expansion
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(chad, be poor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chad, be poor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chad, be poor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor)
...
Typical and Remarkable implies Salient
Typical implies Plausible
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, is poor)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)
Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor)
Typicality inheritance from parent to child
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Typical(chad, is poor)
⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)