chad: is poor country

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents place
Weight: 0.58
, state
Weight: 0.54
, country
Weight: 0.54
, nation
Weight: 0.50
, person
Weight: 0.49
Siblings arkansas
Weight: 0.32
, central african republic
Weight: 0.32
, milwaukee
Weight: 0.32
, delaware
Weight: 0.32
, tennessee
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is poor country 1.00
be poor country 1.00
is poor 0.93
be poor 0.92
is country 0.84
be country 0.84
is underdeveloped country 0.82
is impoverished 0.79
is low income country 0.79
is developing country 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chad, is poor country)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(country, is poor)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(arkansas, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(milwaukee, is poor)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is poor)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(central african republic, is country)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(country, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(chad, is poor country)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(central african republic, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is poor)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(milwaukee, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(milwaukee, is poor)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(central african republic, is country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(central african republic, is country)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(arkansas, is poor) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(arkansas, is poor)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(chad, is poor country)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(chad, be poor country)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, be poor country)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(chad, be poor country)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(chad, be poor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(chad, be poor)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(chad, is poor)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, is poor)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(chad, be poor)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor country)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chad, is poor)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(chad, is country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(chad, is country)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(chad, be country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, be country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(chad, is developing country)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(chad, is low income country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(chad, be poor)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(chad, be country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(chad, is impoverished)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(chad, is low income country)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(chad, is impoverished)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(chad, is low income country)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(chad, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(chad, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(chad, is developing country)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(chad, is impoverished)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(chad, is low income country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(chad, is underdeveloped country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(chad, be country)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(chad, is impoverished)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(chad, is country)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(chad, is poor country)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(central african republic, is country)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor country)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(milwaukee, is poor)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(arkansas, is poor)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(central african republic, is poor)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(chad, is poor country) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(country, is poor)